Der er få der argumenterer for at Starfield er et dårligt spil, men der findes mange der har relativt komplekse forhold til Bethesda Game Studios' seneste, og der er da også lidt skuffelse derude sammenlignet med studiets legendariske tidligere titler.
Men spørger du Todd Howard, så er responsen faktisk sammenlignelig med den som de tidlige Elder Scrolls- og Fallout-spil fik. I et nyt interview (via GamesRadar) siger Howard nemlig dette:
"If you look back at the beginning of Elder Scrolls, the beginning of Fallout, they're a little bit the same. And then, you find an audience that loves that. So, I think it's true that Fallout 76 and Starfield, clearly, they're creatively different than what we had done. And we really wanted to do that. When you're doing a certain type of thing for, in my case, 20 years, we want to try some other things and learn from that. We have ideas that we want to get out there. We're fortunate those games have found, in the scheme of things, giant audiences that let us keep doing things in them. Even though they (Starfield and Fallout 76) are a bit off the core path of the single-player games that we have been doing, we're just fortunate to have the success that we've had with them."
Spørgsmålet er om hvorvidt Starfield kan sammenlignes med de to andre seriers spæde start. Hvad synes du?